From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 4, 2008
247 S.W.3d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 90111.

March 4, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Audrain County, Cause No. 06-AU-CC00052, Keith M. Sutherland, Judge.

Matthew Ward, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jaime Wilson Corman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.



ORDER


Scott Long (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (judgment) denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing, filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2); Rule 24.035(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Long v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 4, 2008
247 S.W.3d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Long v. State

Case Details

Full title:Scott A. LONG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 4, 2008

Citations

247 S.W.3d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)