From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 2, 2004
876 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 5D03-2833.

Opinion filed July 2, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Victor J. Musleh, Judge.

Anthony Long, Monticello, Pro Se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Anthony Long appeals an order of restitution rendered by the trial court. It appears from the record that Mr. Long was not represented by counsel at the hearing. Restitution is part of sentencing. A criminal defendant is entitled have counsel representing him or her at sentencing, including that part of sentencing during which restitution is imposed. See Moore v. State, 868 So.2d 683 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Moment v. State, 645 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Accordingly, the order must be reversed.

Mr. Long also argues that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose the requirement of restitution against him. Given the procedural history of this case, however, we conclude that the trial court had, and upon remand will still have the jurisdiction to impose restitution.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SHARP, W., PALMER and MONACO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Long v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 2, 2004
876 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Long v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY LONG, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 2, 2004

Citations

876 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Ritch v. State

This includes any hearing to determine the amount of restitution. See Long v. State, 876 So.2d 718, 718 (Fla.…

Morgan v. State

A criminal defendant is entitled to have counsel at sentencing proceedings. Carter v. State, 408 So.2d 766…