From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 2, 1932
139 So. 188 (Fla. 1932)

Opinion

Decision filed February 2, 1932.

A writ of error to the Criminal Court of Record for Orange County; W. M. Murphy, Judge.

Lyman M. Beckes, for Plaintiff in Error;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.

BROWN, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Long v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 2, 1932
139 So. 188 (Fla. 1932)
Case details for

Long v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD LONG, Plaintiff in Error, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Feb 2, 1932

Citations

139 So. 188 (Fla. 1932)
139 So. 188