From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2018
CASE NO. CV 15-2306-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 15-2306-AG (PJW)

09-27-2018

BRIAN A. LONG, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). DATED: Sept 27, 2018.

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Long v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2018
CASE NO. CV 15-2306-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Long v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN A. LONG, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. CV 15-2306-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2018)