From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Long

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 20, 2003
105 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81469

May 20, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Mary B. Schroeder.

Jeffery T. McPherson, Cynthia A. Sciuto, Armstrong Teasdale, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

John E. Hilton, Joyce M. Capshaw, Carmody MacDonald, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Mary K. Hoff, J. and George W. Draper III, J.


[THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]


ORDER


Mary Ellen Long (Wife) appeals from the trial court's Modification Judgment reducing Terrence R. Long's (Husband) maintenance obligation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Holt v. Holt, 633 S.W.2d 171, 173 (Mo.App.E.D. 1982). No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Long v. Long

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 20, 2003
105 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Long v. Long

Case Details

Full title:MARY ELLEN LONG, Petitioner/Appellant, v. TERRENCE R. LONG…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 20, 2003

Citations

105 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)