From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Lain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 21, 2017
16-CV-6531-EAW-JWF (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2017)

Opinion

16-CV-6531-EAW-JWF

03-21-2017

VINCENT LONG, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR CHRISTOPHER LAIN, et al., Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a pro se Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and requested the appointment of counsel. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court may appoint counsel to assist indigent litigants, see, e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles Sears Real Estate, Inc., 865 F.2d 22, 23 (2d Cir. 1988), and the assignment of pro bono counsel in civil cases is within the trial Court's discretion. In re Martin-Trigona, 737 F.2d 1254 (2d Cir. 1984). In determining whether to assign counsel, the Court considers several factors, including whether the claims seem likely to be of substance; whether the pro se Plaintiff is able to investigate the facts concerning his claim; whether the legal issues are complex; and whether there are special reasons why the appointment of counsel would be more likely to lead to a just determination. See Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3 390, 392 (2d Cir. 1997); Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986).

Additionally, each lawyer — especially those who are admitted to practice in federal court and who therefore are in a position to reap the benefits of such practice — has a professional obligation to provide pro bono services for the poor. See New York Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1. In addition, Rule 83.1(f) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure provides that:

Every member of the bar of this Court who maintains, or whose firm maintains, an office in this District, shall be available upon the Court's request for appointment to represent or assist in the representation of indigent parties. Appointments under this Rule shall be made in a manner such that no Member shall be requested to accept more than one (1) appointment during any twelve (12) month period.

With this Order the Court grants Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel, and the Court hereby assigns Gregory L. Bonney, Esq. of Bonney Law Firm, 20 West Main Street, P.O. Box 316, Waterloo, NY 13165, pro bono, to faithfully and diligently represent Plaintiff in this case.

The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order to Mr. Bonney along with this Court's Guidelines Governing Reimbursement from the District Court Fund of Expenses Incurred by Court Appointed Counsel. The Chief Judge of this Court will also issue an Order directing PACER to waive its fees so that pro bono counsel can access any other documents filed in this case that he may need. If any portions of the file in this matter are not available through PACER on the Court's Case Management/Electronic Case Management System, the Clerk of the Court will provide a free copy of any such documents to pro bono counsel upon request.

This information and the forms are also available on the Court's web site at the Attorney Information link from the home page located at: http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/pro-bono-program-distriet-court-fund. --------

A status conference with counsel relative to this matter is scheduled for May 5, 2017 at 11:30 a.m. before the. undersigned.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

HON. JONATHAN W. FELDMAN

United States Magistrate Judge DATED: Rochester, New York

March 21, 2017


Summaries of

Long v. Lain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 21, 2017
16-CV-6531-EAW-JWF (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Long v. Lain

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT LONG, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR CHRISTOPHER LAIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 21, 2017

Citations

16-CV-6531-EAW-JWF (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2017)