From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 26, 1990
159 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hentel, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon our review of the record herein, we conclude that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to serve an amended complaint (see, CPLR 3025 [b]; Sentry Ins. Co. v Kero-Sun, Inc., 122 A.D.2d 204; Vastola v Maer, 48 A.D.2d 561, 567, affd 39 N.Y.2d 1019; cf., Liebman v Newhouse, 122 A.D.2d 252; Fiorentino v Cobble Hill Nursing Home, 101 A.D.2d 825). Brown, J.P., Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Long v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 26, 1990
159 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Long v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL LONG, as Administratrix of the Estate of SHIRLEY A. HANKINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)