Opinion
March 26, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hentel, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Upon our review of the record herein, we conclude that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to serve an amended complaint (see, CPLR 3025 [b]; Sentry Ins. Co. v Kero-Sun, Inc., 122 A.D.2d 204; Vastola v Maer, 48 A.D.2d 561, 567, affd 39 N.Y.2d 1019; cf., Liebman v Newhouse, 122 A.D.2d 252; Fiorentino v Cobble Hill Nursing Home, 101 A.D.2d 825). Brown, J.P., Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.