From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Bearden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 10, 1916
160 P. 467 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

Nos. 8242, 8305

Opinion Filed October 10, 1916.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Parties — Joint Judgment. Syllabus same as in Michael v. Isom, 43 Okla. 708, 143 P. 1053.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; Geo. C. Crump, Judge.

Action between Israel Long and J.S. Bearden and others. From the judgment, Long brings error. Action between the United States Fidelity Guaranty Company and Israel Long and others. From the judgment, the Fidelity Guaranty Company brings error. Causes consolidated in Supreme Court. Heard on motions to dismiss. Order consolidating causes set aside, and motion to dismiss overruled in the latter cause, and sustained in the former.

John Caruthers and Alex Johnston, for Israel Long.

C.T. Huddleston and J.B. Patterson, for J.S. Bearden.

R.A. Hockensmith, for United States Fidelity Guaranty Co.


Motion to dismiss appeal, which is from a money judgment for $1,785, is based upon the grounds: (1) That the judgment rendered in the lower court was a joint judgment against the United States Fidelity Guaranty Company and H.G. Malot, and that Malot has not been made a party to the proceedings in error; (2) that no case-made was ever served on Malot. After this motion to dismiss had been filed, these causes were consolidated by order of this court upon motion filed.

The case-made in No. 8242 was served upon Malot's attorney, and Malot has been made a party defendant in error. It will therefore be seen that the objections urged for dismissal of cause No. 8242 are untenable. But in case No. 8305 said Malot was not made a party to this appeal, and, since the judgment was a joint judgment against Malot and the surety company, he should have been joined in the appeal. Michael v. Isom, 43 Okla. 708, 143 P. 1053.

It would therefore seem that the motion to dismiss should be overruled in case No. 8242, and it is so ordered; and that the order consolidating these causes be set aside and cause No. 8305 be dismissed pursuant to the motion.


Summaries of

Long v. Bearden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 10, 1916
160 P. 467 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

Long v. Bearden

Case Details

Full title:LONG v. BEARDEN et al. UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY CO. v. LONG et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 10, 1916

Citations

160 P. 467 (Okla. 1916)
160 P. 467

Citing Cases

Mann v. Mann

This is clearly a joint judgment against the defendant William J. Mann and Western Indemnity Company. Under…

Furst v. Lucas

The rule is general if not universal that all parties against whom a joint judgment is rendered must be made…