From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Aerotek, Inc.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Aug 26, 2021
No. 2021-70834 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)

Opinion

2021-70834 Motion 531638

08-26-2021

KAREN LONG, Respondent, v. AEROTEK, INC., et al., Appellants.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion for order directing pro hac vice admission of William E. Corum, Esq., an attorney admitted in the States of Missouri and Kansas, pursuant to section 520.1 (a) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, without costs, and William E. Corum, Esq., is admitted pro hac vice for the purpose of representing appellants upon the appeal.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Long v. Aerotek, Inc.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Aug 26, 2021
No. 2021-70834 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Long v. Aerotek, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN LONG, Respondent, v. AEROTEK, INC., et al., Appellants.

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department

Date published: Aug 26, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-70834 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)