From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long Island Railroad Co. v. Marchica

U.S.
Jan 9, 1995
513 U.S. 1079 (1995)

Summary

holding that where plaintiff's "emotional distress was the direct result of documented physical injury and was reasonably foreseeable in light of the fact that [the plaintiff] may have been exposed to HIV, he was not required to prove actual exposure to the disease in order to state a viable cause of action"

Summary of this case from Phillips v. Restaurant Mgmt. of Carolina, L.P.

Opinion

No. 94-756.

January 9, 1995.


ORDERS

C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 F. 3d 1197.


Summaries of

Long Island Railroad Co. v. Marchica

U.S.
Jan 9, 1995
513 U.S. 1079 (1995)

holding that where plaintiff's "emotional distress was the direct result of documented physical injury and was reasonably foreseeable in light of the fact that [the plaintiff] may have been exposed to HIV, he was not required to prove actual exposure to the disease in order to state a viable cause of action"

Summary of this case from Phillips v. Restaurant Mgmt. of Carolina, L.P.

noting that amount of damages to sustain a civil RICO claim must be "clear and definite"

Summary of this case from Tsipouras v. W M Properties, Inc.

warning pro se litigant that he would be subject to monetary and other sanctions if he continued to file baseless complaints

Summary of this case from McCampbell v. KPMG Peat Marwick
Case details for

Long Island Railroad Co. v. Marchica

Case Details

Full title:LONG ISLAND RAILROAD CO. v. MARCHICA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 9, 1995

Citations

513 U.S. 1079 (1995)

Citing Cases

In re Krause

Krause's Tax Court challenge was unsuccessful and the disallowed deductions flowing to the Barton partners…

In re Krause

Krause's Tax Court challenge was unsuccessful and the disallowed deductions flowing to the Barton partners…