PER CURIAM. This cause is affirmed on the authority of Lonestar Florida, Inc. v. Cooper, 408 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We find no conflict between this case and Migliore v. Crown Liquors of Broward, Inc., 448 So.2d 978 (Fla. 1984).
We deny the petition for certiorari as there is an adequate remedy at law by plenary appeal. There is nothing in the record to establish that the defendant/petitioner knowingly served a person habitually addicted to the use of any alcoholic beverages, which is necessary to establish liability. See Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1983); Lonestar Florida, Inc. v. Cooper, 408 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Although that void in the record suggests there has been a departure from the essential requirements of law, existence of an adequate remedy at law precludes certiorari as a remedy. HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
No cause of action exists in favor of an injured party under these circumstances. Lonestar Florida, Inc. v. Cooper, 408 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Consequently, we need not consider the plaintiffs' claimed error in not allowing this amendment.
Affirmed. See Lonestar Florida, Inc. v. Cooper, 408 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Lonestar Florida, Inc. v. Cooper, 408 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA, 1982) (7 F.L.W. 210); MacArthur v. Travelers Insurance Co., 400 So.2d 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.