From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Londono v. Altenkirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1999
261 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 24, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not err in granting the plaintiff's cross motion to amend the caption to reflect the proper name of the plaintiff ( see, CPLR 305 [c]; 2001; First Wis. Trust Co. v. Hakimian, 237 A.D.2d 250; Homemakers, Inc. v. Williams, 100 A.D.2d 505; Covino v. Alside Aluminum Supply Co., 42 A.D.2d 77, 80; A.A. Sutain Ltd. v. Montgomery Ward Co., 22 A.D.2d 607, affd 17 N.Y.2d 776).

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Londono v. Altenkirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1999
261 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Londono v. Altenkirsch

Case Details

Full title:JAIRO LONDONO, Respondent, v. HENRY T. ALTENKIRSCH et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

Tilden v. Nicaj

The Supreme Court did not err in permitting the amendment of the caption to name Tilden Management as the…