From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

London v. River Rouge PD

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 3, 2024
24-cv-10754 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-10754

04-03-2024

RANDALL TREMAYNE LONDON Plaintiff, v. RIVER ROUGE PD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF CONSENT AND REFERENCE OF CIVIL ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF NO. 6)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 25, 2024, Plaintiff Randall Tremayne London filed this action against Defendants River Rouge Police Department, the Barton Morris Law Firm, and Wayne County. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) On April 1, 2024, London filed a Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form with the Court. (See Notice, ECF No. 6.) But the Court cannot make that referral unless all parties consent, and none of the Defendants have appeared in this action. Thus, the Court will STRIKE London's Notice as premature. London may re-file the Notice after Defendants appear in this case if and only if he obtains Defendants' consent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

London v. River Rouge PD

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 3, 2024
24-cv-10754 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2024)
Case details for

London v. River Rouge PD

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL TREMAYNE LONDON Plaintiff, v. RIVER ROUGE PD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 3, 2024

Citations

24-cv-10754 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2024)