From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

London Street Florist v. Mercede

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 20, 1990
555 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-3294.

January 17, 1990. Rehearing Denied February 20, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Eugene S. Garrett, J.

Randolph W. Adams, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Russell S. Adler of Roderman, Spadaro Karmin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


We affirm in part and reverse in part. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in allowing the appellee, midway through the trial, to amend its complaint to add a claim under an earlier lease not sued on in the complaint being tried. We reject the other asserted claims of error. We remand with directions that further proceedings be conducted to delete from the damages awarded any claim under the earlier lease. The trial court may, as it determines to be necessary, resolve this issue on the present record or conduct further appropriate proceedings to resolve the issue.

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

London Street Florist v. Mercede

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 20, 1990
555 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

London Street Florist v. Mercede

Case Details

Full title:LONDON STREET FLORIST, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, HARVEY HENNAN, AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 20, 1990

Citations

555 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)