From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

London Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Aug 1, 1928
117 So. 891 (Fla. 1928)

Opinion

Decision filed August 1, 1928. Petition for rehearing denied September 19, 1928.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; F. M. Robles, Judge.

Hampton, Bull Pencke, for Plaintiff in Error;

Macfarlane, Pettingill, Macfarlane Fowler, for Defendant in Error.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, Mr. Chief Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict and that the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

ELLIS, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

London Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Aug 1, 1928
117 So. 891 (Fla. 1928)
Case details for

London Scottish Assurance Corp. v. Dolce

Case Details

Full title:LONDON SCOTTISH ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LIMITED, Plaintiff in Error, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Aug 1, 1928

Citations

117 So. 891 (Fla. 1928)
117 So. 891