From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loncar v. Western Peak, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 6, 2012
Civil Action:08-cv-01592-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action:08-cv-01592-PAB-CBS

09-06-2012

ROBERT LONCAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WESTERN PEAK, LLC, et al., Defendants.

George Maurice Allen Brian Thomas Moore


Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer


FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402

Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason


Counsel:


George Maurice Allen


Brian Thomas Moore


COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 1:27 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Parties appearing telephonically instead of physically as ordered.

The parties address the court regarding the fact that they have reached an agreement on all issues. They e-mailed their stipulation to Magistrate Judge Shaffer's chambers prior to the start of this hearing.

The court addresses the parties regarding its ORDER setting hearing on 190 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses (Docket No. 192, filed on 8/17/2012) and why the parties are not physically present as stated in this order.

The court addresses the parties regarding possibly imposing sanctions. The court orders that the parties be physically present for this hearing as previously ordered. Court shall be in recess until the parties arrive.

HEARING CONTINUED.

Court in recess: 1:35 p.m.
Court in Session: 1:58 p.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

The court addresses the parties regarding the defendant's MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses (Docket No. 190, filed on 8/10/2012).

Discussion between the court and Mr. Moore regarding why the parties did not show up as previously ordered and the stipulation that was e-mailed to Magistrate Judge Shaffer's chambers.

Discussion between the court and Mr. Allen regarding why the parties did not show up as previously ordered, the stipulation that was e-mailed to Magistrate Judge Shaffer's chambers, discovery responses provided to defense counsel (the court feels the responses were deficient), Rule 34, Rule 33, Rule 37, Rule 69 pertaining to discovery requests, Rule 26(c) and protective orders, the proper accretion of attorney-client privilege when answering interrogatories, and Rule 37(a).

Further discussion with Mr. Allen regarding Rule 27(a), why sanctions should not be imposed, and awarding fees and costs.

For reasons as stated on the record,

ORDERED: The court GRANTS the defendant's MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses (Docket No. 190, filed on 8/10/2012). The court shall award fees and costs incurred by Mr. Moore as a result of filing this motion. The court shall not award fees and costs incurred by Mr. Moore as a result of attending this hearing.

Further discussion between the court and the parties regarding their stipulation.

ORDERED: The court shall require Mr. Allen to fully produce all documents and all information sought after in the discovery request at issue no later than September 11, 2012 by 5:00 p.m. Or alternatively, the parties shall submit a proposed joint motion for a superseding order indicating that the parties agree and are asking the court, in lieu of its order requiring production, to execute a superseding order directing production forthwith under the stipulated terms no later than September 10, 2012 12:00 p.m.

HEARING CONCLUDED.

Court in recess: 3:04 p.m.
Total time in court: 01:14

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.


Summaries of

Loncar v. Western Peak, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 6, 2012
Civil Action:08-cv-01592-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Loncar v. Western Peak, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LONCAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WESTERN PEAK, LLC, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action:08-cv-01592-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)