From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lona-Ramirez v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
May 24, 2013
CIVIL NO. B-12-103 (S.D. Tex. May. 24, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. B-12-103 CRIMINAL NO. B-11-442

05-24-2013

AURELIO LONA-RAMIREZ Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in the above-referenced cause of action. The time to file objections has passed. Petitioner has filed no objections. After a de novo review of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Aurelio Lona-Ramirez's § 2255 Motion (Docket Entry 1) is DENIED and his case is DISMISSED.

DONE at Brownsville, Texas this 24 day of May 2013.

___________

Hilda Tagle

Senior United Stafes District Judge


Summaries of

Lona-Ramirez v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
May 24, 2013
CIVIL NO. B-12-103 (S.D. Tex. May. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Lona-Ramirez v. United States

Case Details

Full title:AURELIO LONA-RAMIREZ Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 24, 2013

Citations

CIVIL NO. B-12-103 (S.D. Tex. May. 24, 2013)

Citing Cases

Ayala-Rodriguez v. United States

Therefore, any argument by Petitioner's counsel urging for the application of the fast-track program would…