From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lombardo v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 2008
53 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-00108.

July 8, 2008.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Grella, J.), dated November 20, 2006, which, on the ground, inter alia, of untimeliness, denied his objections to an order of the same court (Beck-Cahn, S.M.), dated August 28, 2006, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed him to pay the sum of $2,286 per month as basic child support.

Philip F. Menna, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On appeal, the father does not challenge the Family Court's denial of his objections to a Support Magistrate's determination concerning issues of child support as untimely filed ( see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; Matter of Burke v Burke, 45 AD3d 591, 592; Matter of Hodges v Hodges, 40 AD3d 639). Thus, the order denying his objections must be affirmed.


Summaries of

Lombardo v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 2008
53 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Lombardo v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOANNE M. LOMBARDO, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS A. THOMAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6208
859 N.Y.S.2d 873

Citing Cases

Rondello v. Jack

On appeal, the petitioner does not challenge the Family Court’s determination that his objections to the…

AA Med. v. Emp. Med. Health Plan of Suffolk Cty.

Inasmuch as the plaintiff does not challenge the court’s determination that the plaintiff lacked standing to…