From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lombardo v. Stoke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1965
24 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

July 6, 1965


In an action to recover damages for a libel, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 12, 1965, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion granted; and complaint dismissed, without costs. Based upon the facts alleged in the pleadings and affidavits, we are of the opinion that the defendants are protected by an absolute privilege in the issuance of the statement of October 6, 1960 here involved ( Sheridan v. Crisona, 14 N.Y.2d 108; Smith v. Helbraun, 21 A.D.2d 830). (For related appeals, see Matter of Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y., 26 Misc.2d 989, mod. 16 A.D.2d 443, mod. 14 N.Y.2d 138. ) Ughetta, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lombardo v. Stoke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1965
24 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Lombardo v. Stoke

Case Details

Full title:JOSEF V. LOMBARDO et al., Respondents, v. HAROLD W. STOKE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Duffy v. Kipers

"The absolute privilege to act in the course of official duties should not turn on the size of the population…