From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lomax v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Aug 28, 2008
No. 14-08-00163-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2008)

Opinion

No. 14-08-00163-CV

Opinion filed August 28, 2008.

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2007-77406.

Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justices GUZMAN and BROWN.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


According to the notice of appeal filed in this case, this is an attempted appeal from an order signed February 4, 2008, sustaining a contest to appellant's pauper's oath related to the fees for filing the underlying suit. The underlying case remains pending in the trial court.

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if permitted by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). There is no statute providing for an interlocutory appeal of the court's ruling on indigency for trial proceedings. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction over this appeal.

On July 16, 2008, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court's intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

Lomax v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Aug 28, 2008
No. 14-08-00163-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Lomax v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:MARK LOMAX, Appellant v. TOMMY B. THOMAS, ET AL., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Aug 28, 2008

Citations

No. 14-08-00163-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sloan v. Sloan

There is no statute providing for an interlocutory appeal of the court's ruling on indigency for trial…

Jones v. Johnson

There is no statute providing for an interlocutory appeal of the court's ruling on indigence for trial…