Lomax v. Davis

Full title: ARTHUR JAMES LOMAX, Applicant, v. JOHN DAVIS, Warden, and JOHN SUTHERS…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03034-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03034-BNB

01-05-2012

ARTHUR JAMES LOMAX, Applicant, v. JOHN DAVIS, Warden, and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents.

Boyd N. Boland

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Applicant has filed a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action and an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action will be granted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (Doc. No. 2) is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 4) is denied as premature. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the "Applicant's Affidavit - Motion for Discovery Request and Testing Evidence" (Doc. No. 5) is denied as premature. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time.

DATED January 5, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge