From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loice v. D.J. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 27, 2013
CV 13-2635 AG(JC) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2013)

Opinion


HAKEEM L. LOICE, Petitioner, v. D.J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 13-2635 AG(JC) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 27, 2013

          (PROPOSED) ORDER (1) ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; (2) OVERRULING OBJECTIONS; (3) DISMISSING UNEXHAUSTED CLAIM IN LIGHT OF PETITIONER'S ELECTION; (4) DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT; AND (5) ORDERING RESPONDENT TO FILE ANSWER

          ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the "Petition"), the Motion to Dismiss the Petition and all documents submitted in conjunction therewith and in opposition thereto, and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation") and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections.

         Petitioner, in the Objections, notes that in the event his Objections are overruled and the Court concludes, as it has, that Claim 2c (as enumerated in the Report and Recommendation) is unexhausted, such that the Petition is "mixed, " petitioner elects to abandon Claim 2c.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) Claim 2c is dismissed; (2) the Motion to Dismiss, which has been rendered moot by the dismissal of Claim 2c, is denied as such; and (3) respondent shall file an Answer addressing the merits of the remaining claims in the Petition within twenty (20) days of the entry of this Order absent further Order of the Court.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Report and Recommendation on petitioner and on counsel for respondent.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Loice v. D.J. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 27, 2013
CV 13-2635 AG(JC) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Loice v. D.J. Soto

Case Details

Full title:HAKEEM L. LOICE, Petitioner, v. D.J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 27, 2013

Citations

CV 13-2635 AG(JC) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2013)