From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loiacano v. Lawrence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 1995
214 A.D.2d 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 24, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellants.

The appellants' submissions made out a prima facie case that the respondent Salvatore Loiacano had not sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The affidavit of chiropractor James S. Kaufman, submitted by the respondents, was deficient insofar as it failed to indicate that the opinion expressed therein was based upon a recent medical examination (see, Philpotts v Petrovic, 160 A.D.2d 856; Covington v Cinnirella, 146 A.D.2d 565). Mangano, P.J., O'Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Loiacano v. Lawrence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 1995
214 A.D.2d 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Loiacano v. Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:SALVATORE LOIACANO et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT LAWRENCE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 606

Citing Cases

Williams v. Ritchie

e of defendants doctors' affidavits to the contrary, which are based on recent examinations" and which…

Williams v. Ritchie

ace of defendants doctors' affidavits to the contrary, which are based on recent examinations" and which…