From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 28, 1996
98 F.3d 618 (11th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-2516.

Decided October 28, 1996.

Daniel C. Shaughnessy, Cowles Shaughnessy, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, Robert F. Spohrer, Spohrer, Wilner Maxwell, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, Brian Wolfman, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Dennis P. Waggoner, Hill, Ward Henderson, P.A., Tampa, FL, Marcus R. Magnuson, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis MN, Daniel g. Jarcho, McKenna Cuneo, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 93-482-CIV-J-20); Harvey E. Schlesinger, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.


On June 26, 1996, the Supreme Court reversed this panel's opinion in Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc., 56 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 1995). See Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 2240, 135 L.Ed.2d 700 (1996). Pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion, we now reverse the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's complaint and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 28, 1996
98 F.3d 618 (11th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Lora LOHR, Michael Lohr, Her Husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Oct 28, 1996

Citations

98 F.3d 618 (11th Cir. 1996)