Lohr v. Kimmel & Silverman, P.C.

Full title: KRISTA v. LOHR v. KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C., et al.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5857 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5857

10-14-2011

KRISTA v. LOHR v. KIMMEL & SILVERMAN, P.C., et al.

Harvey Bartle III

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2011, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) the motion of plaintiff to compel discovery responses (Doc. Nos. 60 and 61) is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks a list of actions handled by the Massachusetts Kimmel & Silverman office from May 2007 until the closing of the office;

(2) the motion of plaintiff to compel is otherwise DENIED; and

(3) the cross motion of defendant for a protective order (Doc. No. 66) is GRANTED except as provided in paragraph (1).

BY THE COURT:

Harvey Bartle III

J.