From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lohnes v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Feb 7, 2020
CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CV-445-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Feb. 7, 2020)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CV-445-JTM-JEM

02-07-2020

JAMES ANDREW LOHNES, Plaintiff, v. MRS. JOHNSON, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

James Andrew Lohnes, an unrepresented pretrial detainee in the Lake County Jail, filed a motion asking the court to find Mrs. Johnson in default because she has not responded to the compliant as ordered. (DE # 42.) On December 4, 2019, Mrs. Johnson was ordered to respond "as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." (DE # 31 at 5.) She was sent a notice of the lawsuit. (DE # 32.) She waived service and thereby had until February 7, 2020, to respond to the complaint. (DE # 35.) Well before that deadline, on January 16, 2020, she filed a motion to dismiss. (DE # 38.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4), that motion extended the time to otherwise plead. Therefore, Mrs. Johnson is not in default.

For these reasons, the motion (DE # 42) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Date: February 7, 2020

s/James T. Moody

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Lohnes v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Feb 7, 2020
CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CV-445-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Feb. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Lohnes v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ANDREW LOHNES, Plaintiff, v. MRS. JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Feb 7, 2020

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CV-445-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Feb. 7, 2020)