From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lohnes v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Dec 17, 2019
CAUSE NO.: 2:19-CV-97-TLS-JPK (N.D. Ind. Dec. 17, 2019)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 2:19-CV-97-TLS-JPK

12-17-2019

JAMES ANDREW LOHNES, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER BROOKS, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

James Andrew Lohnes, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a Motion to Strike Defendants Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Court Order [ECF No. 39] seeking to strike the Response [ECF No. 32] to his Motion to Enforce Court Order [ECF No. 24]. This motion [ECF No. 24] has already been ruled upon [ECF No. 35]. Lohnes asserts that counsel has deliberately misspelled the name of a corrections employee in order to harass him. There is no evidence that any misspelling was for the purpose of harassing him. Furthermore, Lohnes was not harmed by the error. The error, if any, had no bearing on this Court's ruling. Lohnes also asks the Court to grant his Motion to Enforce Court Order. To the extent that Lohnes is seeking reconsideration of this Court's December 4, 2019, Order denying his Motion to Enforce Court Order, the Court stands by its earlier ruling.

Accordingly, the Motion [ECF No. 39] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED on December 17, 2019

s/ Theresa L. Springmann

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Lohnes v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Dec 17, 2019
CAUSE NO.: 2:19-CV-97-TLS-JPK (N.D. Ind. Dec. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Lohnes v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ANDREW LOHNES, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER BROOKS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Dec 17, 2019

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 2:19-CV-97-TLS-JPK (N.D. Ind. Dec. 17, 2019)