. Here, we conclude that "[p]laintiff set forth sufficient factual allegations of defendant['s] affirmative acts of deception to raise a triable issue of fact whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel should apply to toll the [s]tatute of [l]imitations" ( Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Freed, 265 A.D.2d 938, 940, 696 N.Y.S.2d 600 [4th Dept. 1999] ; cf.Lohnas v. Luzi [Appeal No. 2], 140 A.D.3d 1717, 1719, 33 N.Y.S.3d 637 [4th Dept. 2016], affd 30 N.Y.3d 752, 71 N.Y.S.3d 404, 94 N.E.3d 892 [2018] ). It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.