From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loggins v. Bundy

Supreme Court of Iowa
Dec 11, 1956
79 N.W.2d 545 (Iowa 1956)

Opinion

No. 49064.

December 11, 1956.

NEW TRIAL: Discretion of trial court. Granting a new trial 1 rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and only for a clear abuse thereof will the supreme court interfere.

BASTARDS: Action to establish paternity — judgment for

plaintiff affirmed.

Appeal from Polk District Court — DRING D. NEEDHAM, Judge.

Action to establish paternity of plaintiff's minor son. From verdict and judgment that defendant is the father, he appeals. — Affirmed.

Henry T. McKnight, of Des Moines, for appellant.

Leo J. Tapscott, County Attorney, and Richard A. Strickler, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.


From a verdict and judgment finding defendant to be the father of plaintiff's child, he appeals.

Plaintiff, never married, has three children, the one in question being the second. She asserts defendant had intercourse with her numerous times in 1952. She became pregnant in August 1952 and the child was born in May 1953. She denies having intercourse with any other man during the spring and summer of 1952. Defendant admits having intercourse with her in 1952 but asserts the last time was in May 1952. He called three men as witnesses who testified they had had intercourse with plaintiff during the summer of 1952.

The error assigned is in denying defendant a new trial. Appellant contends the verdict is contrary to the evidence; the result of passion and prejudice, and that plaintiff has failed to carry the burden of proof.

[1] All parties concede that the granting of a new trial rests in the sound discretion of the trial court and that only for a clear abuse thereof will this court interfere.

[2] The case presents purely a fact question. Assuming that the three men did have intercourse with her, that fact would not excuse the defendant, if the father of the child — a fact which the jury could find under this record if it believed the plaintiff, as it must have done. See State v. Baker, 89 Iowa 188, 56 N.W. 425.

Finding no error the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. — Affirmed.

All JUSTICES concur.


Summaries of

Loggins v. Bundy

Supreme Court of Iowa
Dec 11, 1956
79 N.W.2d 545 (Iowa 1956)
Case details for

Loggins v. Bundy

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE L. LOGGINS, appellee, v. EDWARD L. BUNDY, appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Iowa

Date published: Dec 11, 1956

Citations

79 N.W.2d 545 (Iowa 1956)
79 N.W.2d 545

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Brown v. Middleton

[5] That complainant's conduct with other men than defendant has been unchaste and indecent is not a defense…