From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Logan v. Salem Baptist Church of Jenkintown

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 24, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 10-cv-0144 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 24, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-cv-0144.

August 24, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant Salem Baptist Church's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 30), Defendants Eastburn Gray, Leopold-Leventhal, and Jonas's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 32), and responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Salem's Motion is DENIED as to Counts III and IX of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, and is GRANTED as to Counts VI, X, XIII, and XIV of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. It is further ORDERED that Defendants Eastburn Gray, Leopold-Leventhal, and Jonas's Motion is GRANTED in all respects as to Defendant Jonas, and on Counts VII, X, XIII, and XIV as to Defendants Eastburn Gray and Leopold-Leventhal. In all other respects, Defendants Eastburn Gray, Leopold-Leventhal, and Jonas's Motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Logan v. Salem Baptist Church of Jenkintown

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 24, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 10-cv-0144 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Logan v. Salem Baptist Church of Jenkintown

Case Details

Full title:WALTER J. LOGAN, JR. and THE DELTA ALLIANCE, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. SALEM…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 24, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-cv-0144 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 24, 2010)

Citing Cases

Bainbridge v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

However, "[a]n improper purpose may . . . be inferred if the action is filed without probable cause." Peek,…