From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loftus v. Loftus

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 27, 2011
NUMBER 13-11 -00192-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. 13-11-00192-CV

Delivered and filed October 27, 2011.

On appeal from the 247th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

Before Justices RODRIGUEZ, VELA, and PERKES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 2, 2011. On September 29, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Loftus v. Loftus

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 27, 2011
NUMBER 13-11 -00192-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Loftus v. Loftus

Case Details

Full title:TAMMARA MAGEE LOFTUS, Appellant, v. PATRICK DAVIS LOFTUS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

NUMBER 13-11 -00192-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2011)