From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loftus v. Carbondale

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 1969
256 A.2d 799 (Pa. 1969)

Opinion

April 30, 1969.

June 27, 1969.

Practice — Judgments — Declaratory — Petition raising disputed questions of fact — Status of members of Board of Managers of Firemen's Pension Fund — Act of June 23, 1931, P. L. 932.

In this case, in which it appeared that plaintiff petitioned for a declaratory judgment to determine whether defendants were legally qualified and legally appointed members of the Board of Managers of the Firemen's Pension Fund of defendant city in accordance with the provisions of the Act of June 23, 1931, P. L. 932, § 4320, as amended; and that the petition raised disputed questions of fact; it was Held that the petition for a declaratory judgment was properly dismissed.

Mr. Justice JONES and Mr. Justice ROBERTS concurred in the result.

Before BELL, C. J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ.

Appeal, No. 212, Jan. T., 1969, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County, Sept. T., 1965, No. 2047, in case of William Loftus v. City of Carbondale et al. Order affirmed; reargument refused September 26, 1969.

Petition for declaratory judgment. Before HOBAN, P. J., without a jury.

Order entered dismissing petition. Petitioner appealed.

George I. Puhak, with him Daniel H. Jenkins, for appellant.

James D. Stone, for appellees, submitted a brief.


This is an appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County dismissing the plaintiffs' petition for a declaratory judgment. The petition which sought a determination of whether the defendants were legally qualified and legally appointed and legally elected members of the Board of Managers of the Firemen's Pension Fund of the City of Carbondale under and in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 1931, P. L. 932, § 4320, as amended, 53 P. S. § 39320, raised disputed questions of fact. For this reason the petition for a declaratory judgment was properly dismissed. Mains v. Fulton, 423 Pa. 520, 522, 224 A.2d 195; Sheldrake Estate, 416 Pa. 551, 553-554, 207 A.2d 802; Mohney Estate, 416 Pa. 107, 109, 204 A.2d 916; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Semple, 407 Pa. 572, 180 A.2d 925; McWilliams v. McCabe, 406 Pa. 644, 179 A.2d 222.

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice JONES and Mr. Justice ROBERTS concur in the result.


Summaries of

Loftus v. Carbondale

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 1969
256 A.2d 799 (Pa. 1969)
Case details for

Loftus v. Carbondale

Case Details

Full title:Loftus, Appellant, v. Carbondale

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 27, 1969

Citations

256 A.2d 799 (Pa. 1969)
256 A.2d 799

Citing Cases

Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. S.G.S. Co.

In Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 452 Pa. 417, 306 A.2d 295 (1973), this Court interpreted the language…

Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. S.G.S. Co.

Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, which has had a rather uncertain history,…