From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LOFT REALTY v. AKY HAT CORP

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 13, 1984
131 Misc. 2d 541 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)

Opinion

December 13, 1984

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, Edward H. Lehner, J.

Haight, Gardner, Poor Havens (William F. Pan and Stanley Givner of counsel), for appellants.

Demov, Morris, Levin Hammerling (Kenneth M. Block of counsel), for respondent.


Final judgment entered June 13, 1984 affirmed, with $25 costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Lehner, J., at the Civil Court.

The entire tenth floor of the subject premises (comprising some 75,000 square feet) was rented to the corporate tenant as factory space for the manufacture of hats. The premises were so utilized during the demised term, and there was no "conversion" of the space to residential use or joint commercial and residential use in the sense contemplated by the Loft Law (Multiple Dwelling Law § 280 et seq.). The fact that an employee of the corporation chose to live in a small area partitioned off from the factory space, constituting less than 2% of the rented space, cannot preclude the landlord from terminating the commercial tenancy at the end of the term, or require the landlord to now comply with residential housing laws to accommodate the corporation's employee (cf. Kaufman v American Electrofax Corp., 102 A.D.2d 140).

HUGHES, J.P., SANDIFER and PARNESS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LOFT REALTY v. AKY HAT CORP

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 13, 1984
131 Misc. 2d 541 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)
Case details for

LOFT REALTY v. AKY HAT CORP

Case Details

Full title:LOFT REALTY CO., Respondent, v. AKY HAT CORP. et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1984

Citations

131 Misc. 2d 541 (N.Y. App. Term 1984)
503 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

Realty v. Vincent

The Loft Law In 1982, article 7-C (§ 280 et seq.) of the Multiple Dwelling Law was enacted "to regulate the…

Jaramillo v. Callen Realty

Thereafter, normal rules will govern. (Blackgold Realty Corp. v Milne, 119 A.D.2d 512 [1st Dept 1986], affd…