From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lofaro v. Bee Cab Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1946
270 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

March 25, 1946.

Present — Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.


Following a collision between a taxicab and a private automobile, each vehicle carrying a driver and a passenger, two actions were brought, consolidated and tried together. In Action No. 1 the private car passenger sues to recover damages for personal injuries from the owner-driver of the private car, the driver of the taxicab, and the owner thereof. In Action No. 2 the owner-driver of the private car sues to recover from the owner and the driver of the taxicab, damages for personal injuries and injury to the private car. After trial by the court and a jury, judgment was entered in favor of the private car passenger against all other parties; and against the owner-driver of the private car in his separate action. Amended judgment entered June 14, 1945, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to defendants-respondents Bee Cab Corporation and Henry Wortman, payable by appellant, Anthony Pensabene. No other costs. No opinion. Appeals from original judgment dated April 18, 1945, dismissed, without costs. The original judgment was superseded by the amended judgment.


Summaries of

Lofaro v. Bee Cab Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1946
270 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Lofaro v. Bee Cab Corporation

Case Details

Full title:FRANK LOFARO, Respondent, v. BEE CAB CORPORATION et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Scudieri

We have considered the merits of the appeal from that order and, if the appeal were not being dismissed, the…