Summary
holding stacking permissible where two company-owned trucks were involved in the same accident but where an express separability clause authorized stacking, as explained in Inman
Summary of this case from Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. AndersonOpinion
December 30, 1952.
Appeal from Supreme Court for Albany County.
Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.
Plaintiff hertofore recovered a judgment for personal injuries against the Oswego Stevedoring Trucking Company, Inc., and several other defendants, in an action arising out of a collision between a car in which plaintiff was riding and a truck owned by the trucking company. This judgment was affirmed, on appeal ( Loerzel v. Carnright, 279 App. Div. 825, motion for leave to appeal denied 303 N.Y. 1014). The record in this case clearly reveals that the jury found two trucks of the trucking company were involved in the accident, and both drivers were guilty of negligence in the operation thereof. The present action was brought by plaintiff directly against the defendant insurance company to recover $70,000 of the $75,000 verdict. Fifty thousand dollars of this amount, plus interest and costs, was paid by the defendant but it denies further liability on the ground the policy limit was $50,000 liability for one person in one accident. The policy in question was a fleet policy, and the Special Term held that it was intended to cover each vehicle the same as though a separate policy had been issued therefor. It also held in effect that an ambiguity existed between the clause covering each vehicle and the clause limiting liability, and that such ambiguity should be resolved against the defendant insurance company. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.