From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loeb v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 25, 2008
No. CIV S-05-00903 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-00903 ALA P.

January 25, 2008


ORDER


On December 26, 2007, this court ordered Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant's answer. On January 18, 2008, Plaintiff filed a document captioned, "PLAINTIFF['S] RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS ANSWER." In this one page document, Plaintiff claims that he does not recognize Defendant's "counter-claim" and can only address such after discovery. Plaintiff's filing does not satisfy the court's December 26, 2007, order.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff file a response to Defendants answer within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this order. Failure to do so may result in dismissal.


Summaries of

Loeb v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 25, 2008
No. CIV S-05-00903 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Loeb v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:DESMON LOEB, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 25, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-05-00903 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)