Loeb v. Runnels

Full title: DESMON LOEB, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 1, 2005

No. CIV S-03-0381-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0381-FCD-CMK-P.

December 1, 2005

ORDER

FRANK DAMRELL JR., District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On October 20, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 20, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied; and

3. The July 22, 2005, scheduling order remains in effect.