From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loeb v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2006
No. CIV S-03-0381-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0381-FCD-CMK-P.

February 16, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff's amended complaint, filed on May 27, 2003. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. X75), filed on February 13, 2006. Plaintiff seeks a 30-day extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing therefor, the request will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff may file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment within 30 days of the date of service of this order.


Summaries of

Loeb v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2006
No. CIV S-03-0381-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Loeb v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:DESMON LOEB, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-0381-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)