From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loco Brands, LLC v. Butler Am., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Mar 31, 2020
CASE NO. 6:18-CV-69-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 6:18-CV-69-JDK-KNM

03-31-2020

LOCO BRANDS, LLC d/b/a DIRECT TEK, Plaintiff, v. BUTLER AMERICA, LLC, and FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Docket No. 2. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 231, the "Report"), which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding Defendant Frontier Communications Corporation's ("Frontier") Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 140) has been presented for consideration. The Report recommends denying Frontier's motion. Frontier filed written objections. Docket No. 245.

The Court reviews objected-to portions of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation de novo. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made."). The Court conducting a de novo review examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days).

Having reviewed Frontier's objections de novo, the Court concludes that the objections are without merit and that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Frontier's objections are OVERRULED and that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Docket No. 231) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Frontier's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 140) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 31st day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Loco Brands, LLC v. Butler Am., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Mar 31, 2020
CASE NO. 6:18-CV-69-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Loco Brands, LLC v. Butler Am., LLC

Case Details

Full title:LOCO BRANDS, LLC d/b/a DIRECT TEK, Plaintiff, v. BUTLER AMERICA, LLC, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Mar 31, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 6:18-CV-69-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2020)