From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lockley v. Tatum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Nov 1, 2012
NO. 5:10-CV-383 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 5:10-CV-383 (MTT)

11-01-2012

EDUARDO L. LOCKLEY, Petitioner, v. Warden CLAY TATUM, Respondent.


ORDER

Before the Court is Petitioner EDUARDO L. LOCKLEY'S motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 22). By Order dated September 17, 2012 (Doc. 19), the undersigned adopted the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 motion be denied and that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability ("COA"). Because this Court has held that Petitioner is not entitled to a COA, his motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED AS MOOT.

______________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Lockley v. Tatum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Nov 1, 2012
NO. 5:10-CV-383 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Lockley v. Tatum

Case Details

Full title:EDUARDO L. LOCKLEY, Petitioner, v. Warden CLAY TATUM, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

NO. 5:10-CV-383 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)