From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Locklear v. Bennett

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 2, 2011
409 F. App'x 652 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-6651.

Submitted: January 12, 2011.

Decided: February 2, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00075-GCM).

Billy Ray Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Billy Locklear, a North Carolina prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing Locklear's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (2006) for failure to demonstrate complete exhaustion of administrative remedies. Locklear represented to the district court that he had not fully exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to one of his claims. Because dismissal of the entire complaint is not required when the prisoner has failed to exhaust some, but not all, of the claims included in his complaint, Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 220-24, 127 S.Ct. 910, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007), we vacate the decision of the district court and remand for further proceedings. We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument will not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Locklear v. Bennett

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 2, 2011
409 F. App'x 652 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Locklear v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:Billy Ray LOCKLEAR, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Boyd BENNETT, Regional…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 2, 2011

Citations

409 F. App'x 652 (4th Cir. 2011)