From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Locke v. Sauers

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 1, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-66J (W.D. Pa. Nov. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-66J.

November 1, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


James Lee Locke ("Petitioner") is a state inmate currently incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Forest ("SCI-Forest"), in Marienville, Pennsylvania. On March 10, 2011, this Court received the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus, and attached motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 1). Petitioner was granted leave to proceed IFP, and the petition was filed, on the following day. (Doc. 2)

This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges. On October 17, 2011, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed, as Petitioner's claims clearly were procedurally defaulted in state court. (Doc. 10 at 11). The magistrate judge further recommended that Petitioner's motion to amend (Doc. 7) be denied as futile, and that a certificate of appealability, see (Doc. 9), be denied. (Doc. 10 at 11). A copy of the report was mailed to Petitioner's address of record, and Petitioner was given until October 31, 2011, to file objections. As of the date of this writing, no objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation (Doc. 10), the following ORDER is entered:

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2011,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to amend (Doc. 7) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation of October 13, 2011 (Doc. 10), is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's remaining pending motions (Docs. 5 and 8) are DENIED as MOOT.


Summaries of

Locke v. Sauers

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 1, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-66J (W.D. Pa. Nov. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Locke v. Sauers

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LEE LOCKE, Petitioner, v. DEBRA K. SAUERS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 1, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-66J (W.D. Pa. Nov. 1, 2011)