From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Locke v. Hancock

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Jun 1, 1879
59 N.H. 85 (N.H. 1879)

Opinion

Decided June, 1879.

The probate court has exclusive jurisdiction of the adjustment and establishment of advancements.

PETITION for partition. Facts found by a referee.

The plaintiff claims title through Stephen and Benjamin, sons of the late John Sanborn, who at his decease was, the owner of the land, and who had conveyed to Stephen and Benjamin other lands exceeding in value their share of his estate. The plaintiff contends that the question of advancements cannot be tried in this suit.

Sanborn and Shirley, for the plaintiff.

Barnard Leach, for the defendant.


The probate court has jurisdiction of all matters relating to the settlement and final distribution of decedents' estates, including advancements. Gen. St., c. 170, s. 2; c. 184, ss. 9, 10; Titus v. Ash, 24 N.H. 319, 327; Henry v. Arms, Smith (N.H.) 39, 44. The defendant must apply to the probate court for an adjustment and establishment of the advancements, and this case may be continued to await the result of that proceeding.

Case discharged.

FOSTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Locke v. Hancock

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Jun 1, 1879
59 N.H. 85 (N.H. 1879)
Case details for

Locke v. Hancock

Case Details

Full title:LOCKE v. HANCOCK

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack

Date published: Jun 1, 1879

Citations

59 N.H. 85 (N.H. 1879)

Citing Cases

Marston v. Lord

ALLEN, J. No question of jurisdiction is presented. Locke v. Hancock, 59 N.H. 85. The amounts of the…

Dixon v. Marston

September 22, 1885, on a petition filed by this appellant, praying that the value of the advancements be…