From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lock v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 25, 2014
Civ. No. 6:13-cv-02091-MC (D. Or. Feb. 25, 2014)

Opinion

Civ. No. 6:13-cv-02091-MC

02-25-2014

DENNIS LOCK, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

MCSHANE, Judge:

Plaintiff, pro se, filed multiple documents in this action, including: (1) a complaint, ECF No. 2; (2) a petition for writ of mandamus, ECF No. 6; (3) a motion for temporary restraining order, ECF No. 7; and (4) a motion for notice of treason, ECF No. 8. This Court dismissed plaintiff's complaint and denied plaintiff's motions. In consideration of plaintiff's pro se status, this Court granted plaintiff until February 5, 2014 to "file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified" in the order. Order, Jan. 6, 2014, ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has not taken additional action since that time. Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to comply with this Court's order, ECF No. 10, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lock v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 25, 2014
Civ. No. 6:13-cv-02091-MC (D. Or. Feb. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Lock v. California

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS LOCK, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 25, 2014

Citations

Civ. No. 6:13-cv-02091-MC (D. Or. Feb. 25, 2014)