From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lochtefeld v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 3, 2018
No. 17-cv-0653 SMV (D.N.M. Jan. 3, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-cv-0653 SMV

01-03-2018

DIANE MARIE LOCHTEFELD, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES UNDER EAJA

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act [Doc. 23], filed on December 19, 2017. Plaintiff requests attorney fees in the amount of $9,388.40 and costs in the amount of $400. Defendant filed no response, and the time for doing so has passed. Her failure to timely respond in opposition constitutes consent to grant the motion. See D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.1(b). The Court, having considered the submissions of counsel, the record in this case, and the relevant law, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, FINDS that the motion is well-taken and will be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act [Doc. 23] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Diane Marie Lochtefeld is authorized to receive $9,788.40 for payment to her attorney for costs and services before this Court, as permitted by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and in accordance with Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1255 (10th Cir. 2007).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff's counsel is ultimately granted attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002) ("Congress harmonized fees payable by the Government under EAJA with fees payable under § 406(b) out of the claimant's past-due Social Security benefits in this manner: Fee awards may be made under both prescriptions, but the claimant's attorney must refun[d] to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.") (internal quotation marks omitted).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

STEPHAN M. VIDMAR

United States Magistrate Judge

Presiding by Consent


Summaries of

Lochtefeld v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 3, 2018
No. 17-cv-0653 SMV (D.N.M. Jan. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Lochtefeld v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:DIANE MARIE LOCHTEFELD, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

No. 17-cv-0653 SMV (D.N.M. Jan. 3, 2018)