From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Locatelli v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Aug 28, 2023
2:22-cv-00014 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00014

08-28-2023

LIVIA LOCATELLI, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 31) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 23). Because no objections have been filed, the district court is not required to review the R&R de novo. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 151 (1985).

The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 31) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. The Plaintiff's motion (Doc. No. 23) is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

This Order constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Locatelli v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Aug 28, 2023
2:22-cv-00014 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Locatelli v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:LIVIA LOCATELLI, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division

Date published: Aug 28, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00014 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2023)

Citing Cases

Frazier v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

. “A reviewing court ‘evaluates whether the ALJ properly considered the factors as set forth in the…