From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Local Search Ass'n v. City & Cnty. of San Fran.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
Case No. CV-11-2776 SBA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV-11-2776 SBA

10-06-2011

LOCAL SEARCH ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; and EDWIN M. LEE, in his official capacity as MAYOR of the City and County of San Francisco, Defendants.

By: Jason Wrubleski Attorney for Plaintiff Local Search Association By: Christine Van Aken* Attorney for Defendants City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Board of Supervisors, and San Francisco Mayor Edwin M. Lee


DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney

DANNY CHOU, State Bar #180240

Chief of Complex and Special Litigation

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755

FRANCESCA GESSNER, State Bar #247553

Deputy City Attorneys

Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


[Local Rule 6-2]

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Local Search Association ("LSA") has filed a motion for preliminary injunction, and that motion has been set to be heard on January 10, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., and

WHEREAS, Defendants City and County of San Francisco, Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, and Mayor Edwin M. Lee ("City") have sought additional time to respond to LSA's motion for preliminary injunction for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Christine Van Aken.

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate as follows.

1. Defendants City and County of San Francisco, Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, and Mayor Edwin M. Lee shall file their brief responding to LSA's motion for preliminary injunction no later than October 21, 2011; and

2. Plaintiff Local Search Association shall file its reply brief in support of its motion for preliminary injunction no later than November 21, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By: Jason Wrubleski

Attorney for Plaintiff Local Search Association

By: Christine Van Aken*

Attorney for Defendants City and County of San

Francisco, San Francisco Board of Supervisors, and San

Francisco Mayor Edwin M. Lee

*THE FILER OF THIS DOCUMENT ATTESTS THAT CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM ALL SIGNATORIES.

] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Local Search Ass'n v. City & Cnty. of San Fran.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
Case No. CV-11-2776 SBA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Local Search Ass'n v. City & Cnty. of San Fran.

Case Details

Full title:LOCAL SEARCH ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV-11-2776 SBA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)