From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lobel v. Southgate Condominium Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 15, 1983
436 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-461.

April 13, 1983. Rehearing Denied June 15, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Paul T. Douglas, J.

Edna L. Caruso, and Easley, Massa Willits, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Dean J. Rosenbach of Lewis, Vegosen Rosenbach, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellee.


This case is per curiam affirmed. However, we pause to comment on the motion for attorneys fees, made by the successful appellee, which we deny.

Increasingly we note a tendency to seek attorneys fees out of season. The Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(b) calls for the filing of such a motion no later than the time for service of the reply brief. In the case now before us the reply brief was filed on November 8, 1982 and it was not until over five months later that the motion for fees was filed. It is because of this tardiness that we have denied it.

LETTS, C.J., DOWNEY, J., and GOLDMAN, MURRAY, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Lobel v. Southgate Condominium Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 15, 1983
436 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Lobel v. Southgate Condominium Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:SHELDON LOBEL AND ADELE R. LOBEL, APPELLANTS, v. SOUTHGATE CONDOMINIUM…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 15, 1983

Citations

436 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

H Greg Auto Pompano, Inc. v. Raskin

As the language within Rule 9.400 is mandatory, our high court has determined the failure to comply with the…

Garrow v. Antonietta

The motion was filed after the time for service of the reply brief, and after Appellants had in fact filed…