From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loaiza v. Schindler Elevator Corp.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 26, 2020
304 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D18-2399

02-26-2020

Diego LOAIZA and Wendy Loaiza, Appellants, v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Appellee.

Robert J. Galamaga, P.A., and Robert J. Galamaga, Miami, for appellants. Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, P.A., and Robin I. Frank and Stuart A. Weinstein (Boca Raton), for appellee.


Robert J. Galamaga, P.A., and Robert J. Galamaga, Miami, for appellants.

Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, P.A., and Robin I. Frank and Stuart A. Weinstein (Boca Raton), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ.

HENDON, J.

Affirmed. See Cole v. Heritage Cmty.'s Inc., 838 So. 2d 1237, 1238 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (holding that after plaintiffs took no action, four years was "more than enough" to justify dismissal with prejudice); Ballestas v. Montego Assoc., 765 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (dismissing case after plaintiff was still unprepared for trial despite four previous continuances and being informed by the court that failure to be prepared for trial would result in dismissal).


Summaries of

Loaiza v. Schindler Elevator Corp.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 26, 2020
304 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Loaiza v. Schindler Elevator Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Diego Loaiza and Wendy Loaiza, Appellants, v. Schindler Elevator…

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Feb 26, 2020

Citations

304 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)