From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loadholt v. The Golden Bear, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 14, 2022
22-CV-7421 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-7421 (RA)

11-14-2022

CHRISTOPHER LOADHOLT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. THE GOLDEN BEAR, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Loadholt v. The Golden Bear, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 14, 2022
22-CV-7421 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Loadholt v. The Golden Bear, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LOADHOLT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 14, 2022

Citations

22-CV-7421 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2022)